Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) FREE
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malamud, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Turcotte, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2006; v. 261; p. 1-9;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.261.01.01
© 2006 Geological Society of London

An inverse cascade explanation for the power-law frequency-area statistics of earthquakes, landslides and wildfires

Bruce D. Malamud1 & Donald L. Turcotte2

1 Environmental Monitoring and Modelling Research Group, Department of Geography, King’s College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK bruce{at}malamud.com
2 Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA turcotte{at}geology.ucdavis.edu

Frequency-magnitude statistics for natural hazards can greatly help in probabilistic hazard assessments. An example is the case of earthquakes, where the generality of a power-law (fractal) frequency-rupture area correlation is a major feature in seismic risk mapping. Other examples of this power-law frequency-size behaviour are landslides and wildfires. In previous studies, authors have made the potential association of the hazard statistics with a simple cellular-automata model that also has robust power-law statistics: earthquakes with slider-block models, landslides with sandpile models, and wildfires with forest-fire models. A potential explanation for the robust power-law behaviour of both the models and natural hazards can be made in terms of an inverse-cascade of metastable regions. A metastable region is the region over which an ‘avalanche’ spreads once triggered. Clusters grow primarily by coalescence. Growth dominates over losses except for the very largest clusters. The cascade of cluster growth is self-similar and the frequency of cluster areas exhibits power-law scaling. We show how the power-law exponent of the frequency-area distribution of clusters is related to the fractal dimension of cluster shapes.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. D. A. Millington, G. L. W. Perry, and B. D. Malamud
Models, data and mechanisms: quantifying wildfire regimes
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 261: 155 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]