Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garfunkel, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Beyth, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2006; v. 259; p. 23-42;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.259.01.04
© 2006 Geological Society of London

Part 1: Plate kinematic and geodynamic framework of the Afar volcanic province

Constraints on the structural development of Afar imposed by the kinematics of the major surrounding plates

Z. Garfunkel1 & M. Beyth2

1 Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University Jerusalem, 91904, Israel zvi.garfunkel{at}huji.ac.il
2 Geological Survey of Israel, 30 Malkhe Yisrael Str., Jerusalem, 95501, Israel mbeyth{at}gsi.gov.il

The development of the Afar rift-rift-rift triple junction is analysed from the view-point of the Nubia, Arabia and Somali plate kinematics. A variety of constraints allow definition of a range of kinematic models that approximate well to the plate motions with a resolution of a couple to tens of kilometres. Rigid plate kinematics probably cannot resolve smaller motions. The size and location of the new area that opened between the major plates is inferred from plate kinematics and this provides a framework in which to assess the structural development that accommodates plate separation.

The development of the Afar region was complicated by the presence of microplates — the Danakil and Aisha blocks — which results in a complex plate boundary geometry. This led to local deformation that does not directly reflect the divergence of the major plates, e.g. rotations of microplates and of minor blocks about vertical axes and strike-slip faulting. The opening of new area was accommodated by various crustal growth and accretion mechanisms, e.g. building of thick new igneous crust, normal seafloor spreading, and/or crustal stretching. Thus, plate motions by themselves do not determine the development of the plate boundaries, as this is strongly influenced by other factors such as lateral variations of the rates of magma supply (e.g. away from, and over, the Afar plume).

The plate boundaries changed — e.g. the Gulf of Aden spreading centre propagated westward c. 2 Ma ago and normal seafloor spreading began along portions of the Red Sea axis since c. 5 Ma ago — while there were no resolvable changes in the plate motions. Such changes therefore signify a reorganization of the way in which plate divergence and addition of new area is accommodated: diffuse extension may give way to separation along a narrow spreading centre, or new plate boundaries may form at the expense of other boundaries that became inactive.