Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blight, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2006; v. 254; p. 187-205;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.254.01.10
© 2006 Geological Society of London

The geological exploration techniques applied by BG in evaluation of the Buzzard Field prior to discovery

Richard M. Moore & Richard D. Blight

BG Group, 100, Thames Valley Park Drive, Reading RG6 1PT, UK

(e-mail: richard.moore{at}bg-group.com)

Substantial technical studies were undertaken by BG in the exploration effort which preceded the discovery of the Buzzard oil field. These studies were of value in forming BG’s perception of prospect risk and reward and confirming the company’s commitment to drill the prospect. Studies ranged from standard evaluation techniques to application of cutting edge technology of the time to innovative applications of software to address specific uncertainties or risks. BG perceived the prospect to be of moderate to high value, with a substantial upside reward, and since acquisition of 3D seismic to have moderate risk. This perception derived from several factors that may be peculiar to this particular prospect:

Furthermore the BG evaluation benefited from: