Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lazo, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Aguirre-Urreta, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2005; v. 252; p. 295-315;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.252.01.15
© 2005 Geological Society of London

Palaeoecology and Palaeobiology

Lithofacies, palaeoecology and palaeoenvironments of the Agrio Formation, Lower Cretaceous of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina

Darío G. Lazo, Marcela Cichowolski, Débora L. Rodríguez & M. Beatriz Aguirre-Urreta

Laboratorio de Bioestratigrafía de Alta Resolución, Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentinadlazo{at}gl.fcen.uba.armcicho{at}gl.fcen.uba.ardeboraro{at}gl.fcen.uba.araguirre{at}gl.fcen.uba.ar

The lithofacies and macrofossil guilds of the Agrio Formation (Upper Valanginian—Lower Barremian) have been analysed using evidence from sedimentological, taphonomic and palaeoecological studies. The study area is Agua de la Mula and adjacent regions in central Neuquén. Seven lithofacies have been recognized in the field, which indicate that the Agrio Formation was deposited in an open-marine, ramp depositional system under storm influence. Lithofacies indicate conditions that range from low-energy basin to high-energy inner ramp. Outer and mid-ramp deposits are the most abundant. Macrofossils have been grouped into 16 guilds based on tiering, life habit and feeding category. The guilds indicate normal benthic oxygen level, normal salinity, and soft—firm muddy and sandy bottoms. Suspension-feeders are more common than deposit-feeders suggesting the predominance of suspended food particles over deposited food resources. A low input of siliciclastics and, possibly, other palaeoceanographic conditions allowed the development of oolitic facies in the inner ramp and coral patch reefs in the upper mid-ramp for a limited period of time.