Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Issen, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Challa, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2005; v. 245; p. 433-452;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2005.245.01.22
© 2005 Geological Society of London

Strain localization conditions in porous rock using a two-yield surface constitutive model

Kathleen A. Issen1 & Vennela Challa2

1 Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, 207 CAMP, Box 5725, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5725, USA issenka{at}clarkson.edu
2 Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Box 5727, 8 Clarkson Avenue, Clarkson University, Postdam, NY 13699-5727, USA

This work examines theoretical conditions for localized deformation in porous rock, with emphasis on two recently identified deformation structures: compaction bands and dilation bands. Field and laboratory observations report that compaction/dilation bands consist of pure compressional/dilational deformation, which form perpendicular to maximum/minimum compression. A bifurcation approach is employed, with a two-yield surface constitutive model, to develop localization conditions under axisymmetric stress states for different stress paths. The first yield surface corresponds to a dilatant, frictional-damage mechanism (brittle regime), while the yield surface cap corresponds to a compactant mechanism (ductile regime). In the transitional regime, where both mechanisms are active, this model successfully predicts compaction bands and shear bands observed in axisymmetric compression tests. Due to discontinuities in the predicted band angle for probable material parameter values, this model may explain the lack of low angle compacting shear band observations in experiments. The two-yield surface model may also be applicable for a non-traditional axisymmetric extension stress path: increasing confining pressure with constant axial compression. Conditions for dilation band formation for this stress path are significantly less restrictive than corresponding compaction band conditions, suggesting that dilation bands could be a common deformation mode for high porosity sandstone.