Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 239; p. 127-145;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.239.01.09
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Methods

Optimal elicitation of probabilistic information from experts

Andrew Curtis1,2 & Rachel Wood1,3

1 Schlumberger Cambridge Research, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EL, UK curtis{at}cambridge.oilfield.slb.com
2 Grant Institute of Earth Science, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK
3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK

It is often desirable to describe information derived from the cumulative experience of human experts in a quantitative and probabilistic form. Pertinent examples include assessing the reliability of alternative models or methods of data analysis, estimating the reliability of data in cases where this cannot be measured, and estimating ranges and probable distributions of rock properties and architectures in complex geological settings.

This paper presents a method to design an optimized process of elicitation (interrogation of experts for information) in real time, using all available information elicited previously to help in designing future elicitation trials. The method maximizes expected information during each trial using experimental design theory. We demonstrate this method in a simple experiment in which the conditional probability distribution or relative likelihood of a suite of nine possible 3-D models of fluvial-deltaic geologies was elicited from a geographically remote expert. Although a geological example is used, the method is general and can be applied in any situation in which estimates of expected probabilities of occurrence of a set of discrete models are desired.