Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hathon, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 237; p. 257-278;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.237.01.15
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Case Studies - Water and Petroleum Fluid Compositional Variations

High temperature quartz cementation and the timing of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Jurassic Norphlet sandstone, offshore Gulf of Mexico, USA

Thomas Taylor1, Richard Stancliffe2, Calum Macaulay1 & Lori Hathon1

1 Shell International Exploration and Production, Bellaire Technology Centre, P.O. Box 481, Houston, Texas 77001, USA thomas.taylor{at}shell.com
2 Shell Exploration and Production Company, New Orleans, Louisiana 70161, USA

Jurassic Norphlet Formation sandstone reservoirs in Mobile Bay (offshore Alabama, USA) produce gas from great depths (>6.4 km) and elevated temperatures (>200 °C). Quartz cement is concentrated at the top of these aeolian reservoirs forming a low porosity ‘tight-zone’ of widely variable thickness (3–58 m) above a more porous reservoir section. The extent of the tight-zone is independent of depositional facies and its thickness strongly influences well performance. Intergranular porosity in the Norphlet has been preserved by inhibition of quartz cementation due to the occurrence of robust grain-coating chlorite. Quantitative petrographic data reveal that chlorite grain-coat coverage is less in the tight-zone sands (mean = 92%) than in the reservoir sands (mean = 99%). Burial history and quartz precipitation kinetics modelling indicate that this seemingly minor difference in the completeness of grain coatings is sufficient to produce the observed differences in cementation and porosity. Quartz cementation to form the tight-zone took place under conditions of deep burial and high temperature. It followed in time the onset of pressure solution, emplacement of liquid hydrocarbons, and the precipitation of a solid hydrocarbon film (pyrobitumen) on the walls of the intergranular pores. Fluid inclusion microthermometry data indicate that volumetrically significant quartz cement precipitated at temperatures of 150 °C or greater from highly saline aqueous fluids. Hydrocarbon-bearing inclusions are notably absent in quartz cement of the tight-zone, implying that the pore fluids were predominantly brine during precipitation. Oil and gas associated with pyrobitumen evidently escaped from Norphlet traps prior to tight-zone cementation. Gas presently found in Norphlet reservoirs of Mobile Bay represents a relatively recent accumulation and is not the product of in situ thermal cracking of oil.