Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 235; p. 349-366;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.15
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Geometry and origin of dolomudstone reservoirs: Pekisko Formation (Lower Carboniferous), western Canada

John C. Hopkins

Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 jchopkin{at}ucalgary.ca

Dolomudstones of the Pekisko Formation in western Canada form small but important oil and gas reservoirs. The reservoirs are irregularly shaped bodies 1 km or so wide and commonly 5–8 m thick. Porosity development within the dolomudstones is a complex function of sedimentation, early facies-selective dolomitization and later telogenetic leaching of calcareous components.

The carbonate sediment precursor of the dolomudstone, interpreted from relict textures preserved in chert nodules, was a microwackestone with abundant silt-sized skeletal fragments. Dolomudstone reservoirs are comprised of dolomudstones, calcareous dolomudstones, and subordinate interbedded dolowackestones and dolograinstones. Some dolomudstone reservoirs are contained entirely within grainstones. Others are capped by tight fenestral lime mudstone that has been dolomitized locally. Dolomitization has been most intense within the centres of these reservoirs, and dolomudstones grade laterally into calcareous dolomudstones.

The association of facies indicates that microwackestones were deposited in subtidal intershoal and lagoonal environments on an inner ramp. Grainstone shoals provided a broad barrier that absorbed wave energy seaward of the lagoon. Fenestral lime mudstones accumulated in peritidal environments in restricted areas of the inner ramp, landward of the lagoon. Dolomitization is interpreted to have been early and selective to the microwackestone facies because it retained permeability or was reactive during early burial. Dolomitizing fluids were most probably derived from overlying formations and made their way downwards through spatially separated conduits. The Pekisko Formation was exposed and sculptured at several Jurassic-Early Cretaceous unconformities. During these times, sandstones and shales were deposited in solution cavities developed within the dolomudstones. Concomitant leaching of calcite increased porosity of the dolomudstone reservoirs.