Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouch, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ambrose, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 235; p. 325-348;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.235.01.14
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Contrasting patterns of pore-system modification due to dolomitization and fracturing in Dinantian basin-margin carbonates from the UK

Jon E. Bouch, Antoni E. Milodowski & Keith Ambrose

British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK

(e-mail: jbouch{at}bgs.ac.uk)

Two examples of Dinantian basin-margin carbonates from the United Kingdom provide potential analogues for fracture and porosity distributions in hydrocarbon reservoirs in dolostones. In both examples pore systems have been extensively modified by dolomitization, fracturing and related mineralization. However, the detailed processes and the end results show some significant differences, highlighting the importance of developing an understanding of the specific pore-system modifying processes when characterizing and modelling porosity distributions in these settings.

In the first example, predominantly low-porosity and low-permeability limestones in Lower Carboniferous inliers in Leicestershire (Cloud Hill) and south Derbyshire (Ticknall) had their pore systems further degraded by extensive dolomitization. Subsequent fracturing and related mineralization were responsible for significant porosity generation adjacent to fractures.

In contrast, in the Sellafield area (west Cumbria), dolomitization was strongly controlled by fractures that were also mineralized by sulphate-rich brines. In the north of the area fractures were filled with an assemblage of barite-fluorite-hematite-calcite that is resistant to corrosion by low-temperature meteoric groundwater. However, in the south of the area the fractures were cemented by anhydrite, which is readily corroded by saline, but sulphatepoor, groundwater formed by percolating meteoric recharge from the east. Progressive dissolution has been ongoing since Tertiary uplift, and has rejuvenated fracture porosity within the dolomitized limestones.