Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stenhouse, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Savage, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 233; p. 235-247;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.233.01.16
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Monitoring experience associated with nuclear waste disposal and its application to CO2 sequestration projects

Michael J. Stenhouse1 & David Savage2

1 Monitor Scientific, 3900 S. Wadsworth Blvd, Suite #555, Denver Colorado 80235, USA mstenhouse{at}monitorsci.com
2 Quintessa Limited, 24 Trevor Road, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 6FS, UK

Monitoring is a key component of the development and operation of nuclear waste repositories, and some of the underlying considerations and lessons learned can benefit projects involving the geological storage of CO2. Before reviewing the general monitoring objectives for nuclear waste repositories, the key differences between nuclear waste disposal and CO2 storage projects are emphasized. The philosophy underlying monitoring after closing/sealing a repository is discussed. Important aspects of this philosophy include the need to collect adequate baseline data representative of the unperturbed site, and the desire to engender public confidence, but not at the expense of compromising the protective barriers of the repository itself. Pre-operational and operational monitoring provide important data that feed into safety assessment calculations, either as input data or as information that can be used to confirm, and/or refine, predictions. Using a specific example of a deep (geological) repository, monitoring experience at the WIPP site in New Mexico is discussed, focusing on methods and techniques that are relevant to CO2 sequestration projects. Such monitoring includes geotechnical (characterization of the evolving behaviour of underground facilities), groundwater (quality and quantity), environmental (impacts on ecosystems), and subsidence (to support subsidence predictions for the WIPP site located in bedded salt formations).