|
1 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK j.b.t.scott{at}bham.ac.uk
2 Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK j.r.hunter{at}bham.ac.uk
Geophysical surveys are being increasingly applied for the detection of clandestine burials. Ground-penetrating radar has been used successfully but is not appropriate for many sites. For this reason, other techniques such as resistivity mapping are being tested. Resistivity is sensitive to many different changes in the ground that can be caused by a grave; however, the small physical extent of the target makes location extremely difficult. Other environmentally caused variations in resistivity may be of the same magnitude as those caused by a grave, and it is important to consider whether the resistivity anomaly caused by a grave can be detected over this background variation. This paper provides a summary of the method and discusses two case studies in which resistivity mapping was employed to locate a clandestine grave. The resistivity results of a survey over moorland were dominated by the thickness of the peat coverage while the resistivity of a survey in a river valley was dominated by various environmental variations, including a medieval furrow system. Both sites were eliminated from enquiries after extensive cadaver dog searches and some excavation, although it was considered that the environmentally caused resistivity variations at both sites would have made location of a grave by resistivity alone extremely difficult. However, the success of resistivity for landfill locations suggests that resistivity may be more appropriate for the location and delineation of larger features such as mass graves.
