Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 231; p. 73-88;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.231.01.05
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Propagation

Predicting fracture swarms — the influence of subcritical crack growth and the crack-tip process zone on joint spacing in rock

Jon E. Olson

Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering Department, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C0300, Austin, TX 78746, USA

Swarms or clusters represent an exception to the widely accepted idea that fracture spacing in sedimentary rock should be proportional to mechanical layer thickness. Experimental studies and static stress analysis do not provide adequate explanation for fracture swarm occurrence. The problem is re-examined numerically, accounting for the dynamics of pattern development for large populations of layer-confined fractures. Two crucial aspects of this model are: (1) the inclusion of three-dimensional effects in calculating mechanical interaction between simultaneously propagting fractures; and (2) the use of a subcritical crack-propagation rule, where propagation velocity during stable growth scales with the crack-tip stress intensity factor. Three regimes of fracture spacing are identified according to the magnitude of the subcritical index of the fracturing material. For low subcritical index material (n = 5) numerous fractures propagate simultaneously throughout a body resulting in irregular spacing that is, on average, much less than layer thickness. For intermediate subcritical index (n = 20) one fracture propagates at a time, fully developing its stress shadow and resulting in a pattern with regular spacing proportional to layer thickness. For high subcritical index cases (n = 80) fractures propagate in a fashion analogous to a process zone, leaving a fracture pattern consisting of widely spaced fracture clusters.