Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bahat, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bankwitz, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 231; p. 103-116;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.231.01.07
© 2004 Geological Society of London

Propagation

The index of hackle raggedness on joint fringes

Dov Bahat1, Peter Bankwitz2 & Elfriede Bankwitz2

1 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
2 Gutenbergstraße 60, 14467 Potsdam, Germany

In a previous laborious study we showed that considerably more new area is formed in hackle sections than in en echelon section per given nominal area of fringe. In the present study we resort to an alternative quantitative method that would enable a relatively rapid correlation between the fracture mode of secondary fractures on joint fringes and their change in fracture morphology. We introduce a set of seven criteria that enable a geologist to place every fringe on the ‘index of hackle raggedness’ (IHR) along a scale between 1 and 10. This method is applied to the ‘Mrákotin joint set’ from a granite quarry in the Bohemian Massif of the Czech Republic. The results show an IHR range between 1.4 ± 0.7 and 6.8 ± 0.7. The gap between the top value of the scale, 10, and the value 6.8 probably suggests that the joints in this study did not form under the most dynamic conditions. Experimental results carried out on polymers show that dynamic fracture is better correlated with the dynamic stress intensity and additional fracture mechanics parameters than with fracture velocity. The demonstration that en echelon segmentation may be obtained at maximum fracture velocity, if mechanical constraints are imposed on the system by crystal anisotropy, possibly suggests that similar results may be obtained under other constraints that need to be elucidated.