Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arthur, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Macchi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1986; v. 23; p. 251-266;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1986.023.01.16
© 1986 Geological Society of London

Gas Field Studies

The Leman Sandstone Formation in U.K. Block 49/28 Sedimentation, Diagenesis and Burial History

T. J. Arthur

Arco British Ltd., London

D. Pilling, D. Bush & L. Macchi

Poroperm Laboratories, Chester

Block 49/28 lies on the northeastern side of the Sole Pit Inversion. The Leman Sandstone Formation increases in thickness from 280 ft to 702 ft southeast wards across the block. The section can be subdivided by facies and by the recognition of major bounding surfaces between aeolian sequences. Transverse dunes up to 100 ft in height have been identified. Early secondary porosity development accompanied by growth of mixed layer clays, feldspar, dolomite and silica cements with minor anhydrite was followed by burial related illitisation of clay minerals and late kaolinite authigenesis.

The most important control on reservoir quality in the block is the development of illite, which reduces permeability. The extent of fibrous illite growth was controlled by pre-Cretaceous burial. Late kaolinite, related to the migration of pore waters accompanying gas, is restricted to gas bearing structures. The relative timing of authigenic mineral growth and the structural history of the area can be combined to pinpoint the timing of gas accumulation as Middle to Late Jurassic.