Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manning, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2004; v. 228; p. 93-123;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.228.01.06
© 2004 Geological Society of London

A new approach to the analysis and interpretation of tracks: examples from the dinosauria

Phillip L. Manning

The Manchester Museum, University of Manchester, Oxford Road Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

Tracks can potentially offer unique sources of information, providing insight into the environments, gait and posture, locomotion and behaviour. Track preservation can yield important information on substrate consistency and enable the recognition of transmitted subsurface tracks. The ability to recognize transmitted tracks has broad implications for the understanding of palaeoenvironments and interpretation of ichnological assemblages. In order to gain an understanding of how tracks are formed in three dimensions, and of their variability of expression in different substrates, controlled laboratory simulations were undertaken. Experiments were designed to recover subsurface track layers, yielding for the first time detailed information on subsurface morphology that could be related to ‘true’ surface track features. It was found that subsurface track relief can be correlated with the magnitude and distribution (across a foot) of load acting on the surface sediment. This pressure is transmitted through the sediment, and deforms successive layers at depth, producing an undertrack. The most significant factor controlling track morphology, whether surface or subsurface, was found to be the moisture/density relationship within the substrate at the time of track formation. Variability in the dimensions of simulated tracks, relative to the ‘true’ surface track, indicates that caution should be exercised when using fossil tracks to calculate hip height, speed, age, and population dynamics. In addition, comparison of experimental tracks with dinosaur tracks from the Yorkshire coast suggests that many morphological differences between vertebrate ichnotaxa reflect sediment rheology and taphonomy rather than taxonomy of the track-maker.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
H. J. Falcon-Lang, M. J. Benton, and M. Stimson
Ecology of earliest reptiles inferred from basal Pennsylvanian trackways
Journal of the Geological Society, 2007; 164: 1113 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. McIlroy
Some ichnological concepts, methodologies, applications and frontiers
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 228: 3 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]