Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2003; v. 218; p. 449-465;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.218.01.23
© 2003 Geological Society of London

Ophiolite Emplacement: Mechanisms and Processes

Ophiolite obduction and the Samail Ophiolite: the behaviour of the underlying margin

D. R. Gray1 & R. T. Gregory2

1 VIEPS, School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia drgray{at}unimelb.edu.au
2 Department of Geological Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275, USA

Samail ophiolite emplacement has become a type-example for ophiolite obduction. Despite this, problems and controversy remain with respect to the age of high-P metamorphism, the vergence of structures in deformed rocks beneath the ophiolite, the suprasubduction character of the ophiolite and the P-T conditions of the metamorphic sole. The presence of major, regional-scale NE-facing isoclinal folds and SW- and west-dipping shear zones with top-to-the-NE shear sense in Arabian margin rocks beneath the Samail Ophiolite nappe requires that the margin was not simply passively overridden during obduction of the ophiolite. The development of these folds at 72–76 Ma is at the time the ophiolite is emplaced finally onto the margin (80–70 Ma), accompanied by development of a major shear zone in Saih Hatat (the upper plate-lower plate discontinuity described by earlier workers) at c. 82–80 Ma. Structural scenarios that incorporate these folds and shear zones include lateral escape from a rising buoyant crustal slice along the former subduction interface, back-folding (‘retrocharriage’) associated with major oceanwards-directed underthrusting, or simple underthrusting of the margin by the oceanic realm. Previous models involving craton-directed overthrusting with domal culminations related to deep-seated footwall and lateral ramps are more applicable to the Tertiary structure and Tertiary evolution of the mountain range. Oman ophiolite obduction clearly involves ocean-vergent thrusting within the continental margin platform to slope facies sequences.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
Z. Garfunkel
Neotethyan ophiolites: formation and obduction within the life cycle of the host basins
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 260: 301 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Wakabayashi and Y. Dilek
What constitutes 'emplacement' of an ophiolite?: Mechanisms and relationship to subduction initiation and formation of metamorphic soles
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 218: 427 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]