Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillis, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2003; v. 216; p. 359-368;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.216.01.23
© 2003 Geological Society of London

Deep Subsurface Sediment Mobilization

Pore pressure/stress coupling and its implications for rock failure

Richard R. Hillis

National Centre for Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Australian Petroleum Cooperative Research Centre, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

Clastic dykes and sills witness that subsurface sediment mobilization is often controlled by the brittle failure of units ‘sealing’ overpressured and liquidized sediments. Brittle failure also imposes a limit on the buoyancy pressure that can be exerted by hydrocarbon columns. Conventional understanding of brittle failure induced by increasing pore pressure (Pp) assumes that total minimum horizontal stress ({sigma}h) is unaffected by changes in pore pressure. However, total minimum horizontal stress increases from shallow, normally pressured sequences to deeper, overpressured sequences. Data from the Canadian Scotian Shelf, the North Sea and the Australian North West Shelf demonstrate such Pp/{sigma}h coupling, with the minimum horizontal stress increasing at approximately 60–80% of the rate of pore pressure (i.e., {Delta}{sigma}h/{Delta}Pp = 0.6–0.8). Hence, a greater increase in pore pressure can be sustained prior to brittle failure of units sealing overpressured compartments than would be predicted by conventional, uncoupled failure models. Furthermore, because total vertical stress is not similarly coupled to pore pressure, differential stress ({sigma}1{sigma}3) reduces as pore pressure increases in normal fault regime basins. Thus, the mode of rock failure can not be inferred from differential stress in the stable state and Pp/{sigma}h coupling promotes tensile over shear failure.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. R. P. Tingay, R. R. Hillis, C. K. Morley, R. E. Swarbrick, and E. C. Okpere
Pore pressure/stress coupling in Brunei Darussalam -- implications for shale injection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 216: 369 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]