Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pohl, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2002; v. 205; p. 177-194;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.205.01.14
© 2002 Geological Society of London

Biodeterioration

Impact of endolithic biofilms on carbonate rock surfaces

Wolfhart Pohl & Jürgen Schneider

Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universität Göttingen Goldschmidtstrasse 3, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany

Almost all natural carbonate rock surfaces as well as carbonate building stones are ubiquitously colonized by micro-organisms such as cyanobacteria, chlorophyceae, fungi and lichens. This colonization occurs endolithically, mostly euendolithically, through active penetration into the rock. Freshly exposed surfaces, such as in glacial forelands of the Dachstein Mountains (Austria) show mature, fully differentiated endolithic colonization after only 15 years of atmospheric exposure. After a time period of 100 to 150 years, coverage of carbonate rock surfaces by endolithic biofilms is almost complete.

Most endolithic biofilms (lichens) show similar internal architecture. Under a residual, protective carbonate rock layer are photobiontic micro-organisms. They occupay a well defined zone between 150 to 300 µm beneath the rock surface. In this zone up to 60% of the rock substrate is replaced by microbial biomass. Within the photobiontic layer a constant recycling of cells takes place, where bacteria act as decomposers. Deeper beneath the substrate develops an initially dense, then progressively thinning hyphal network of the mycobiont (i.e. a fungus).

Significant differences in amounts and distribution of biomass were observed and quantified which are regional and climatic, but also local and surface age-controlled. Temperature, irradiation and water availability are presumed to be the primary factors. Evidence for a biogenic mechanical surface destabilization (grain loss, desquamation, exfoliation) as observed on siliciclastic rocks, was not found on natural carbonate rock surfaces.

The ‘life strategy’ of endolithic biofilms is adapted to conserve their substrates. It commences with quick emplacement within the rock, initially causing some material loss. However, as soon as the endolithic biofilm is established, approaching an equilibrium with the climatic and ecological conditions, it behaves essentially conservatively: it does not continue with growth increments or habitat enlargement.

This adaptation of euendolithic biofilms has a generally more protective than destructive impact on their carbonate rock substrates. These observations are important for a better understanding of weathering and deterioration processes, applicable to protection policies and maintenance of cultural monuments.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
B. J. Smith and R. Prikryl
Diagnosing decay: the value of medical analogy in understanding the weathering of building stones
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 271: 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. Hoppert, R. Berker, C. Flies, M. Kamper, W. Pohl, J. Schneider, and S. Strobel
Biofilms and their extracellular environment on geomaterials: methods for investigation down to nanometre scale
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2002; 205: 207 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]