Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appleby, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tarlo, L. B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1967; v. 2; p. 695-731;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1967.002.01.47
© 1967 Geological Society of London

Vertebrata

Chapter 28 Reptilia

R. M. Appleby, M.SC. PH.D. F.G.S., A. J. Charig, M.A. PH.D. F.G.S., C. B. Cox, M.A. PH.D. F.Z.S., K. A. Kermack, PH.D. F.G.S. & L. B. H. Tarlo, D.SC. PH.D. F.L.S. F.A.Z. F.Z.S. F.G.S.

Department of Geology, University College, Cathays Park, Cardiff, Wales
Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London S W 7
Department of Zoology, King’s College, Strand, London W C 2
Department of Zoology, University College, Gower Street, London W C 1
Department of Geology, The University, Reading, Berkshire

Introduction. The Reptilia are frequently divided into subclasses on the basis of the temporal openings in the skull roofing bones: Anapsida (no openings, incl. Chelonia and Cotylosauria), "Parapsida" (upper opening, Ichthyosauria and Plesiosauria), Synapsida (lower, mammal-like reptiles), Diapsida (both upper and lower, Lepidosauria and Archosauria). Although this classification is perfectly adequate for living reptiles, it cannot be satisfactorily applied to the fossil groups. Unfortunately at present it is not possible to give a classification which is acceptable to all workers in the field, and in consequence that employed here represents a compromise between two basically opposed views.

One school of thought believes that the reptiles are monophyletic and that most groups can be derived from the captorhinomorph cotylosaurs. The other school claims that they are polyphyletic and that several groups had separate origins from the Amphibia. Thus Watson (1957) from his study of the ear region concluded that the cotylosaurs included the ancestors of the sauropsids and the theropsids—the captorhinomorphs belonging to the latter group. In this context the position of the millerosaurs is critical, and in the interests of neutrality they are included in the documentation as submitted. Thus they appear both as captorhinomorphs (C.B.C.) and as lepidosaurs (L.B.H.T.)!

In the classification the following separate subclasses are recognized: Anapsida, Ichthyopterygia, Sauropterygia, Placodontia, Proganosauria, Incertae sedis (for the orders Araeoscelidia, Trilophosauria, Proterosauria), Lepidosauria, Archosauria and Synapsida. [L.B.H.T.]

Subclass ANAPSIDA

Order COTYLOSAURIA

Origin: from unknown, very early seymouriamorph amphibians? (see Fox & Bowman 1966).

Family ROMERIIDAE Price 1937

The most primitive family, probably ancestral to all other cotylosaur families.

First,

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.