Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aberhan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2002; v. 194; p. 127-139;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.194.01.10
© 2002 Geological Society of London

Opening of the Hispanic Corridor and Early Jurassic bivalve biodiversity

Martin Aberhan

Museum für Naturkunde, Institut für Paläontologie, Invalidenstr. 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany martin.aberhan{at}rz.hu-berlin.de

The Hispanic Corridor is a postulated marine seaway linking the eastern Pacific and western Tethyan oceans as early as Early Jurassic times. Two existing hypotheses relate the Pliensbachian-Toarcian bivalve extinction and recovery to immigration of bivalve species through the Hispanic Corridor. The extinction hypothesis implies that, in South America, the Pliensbachian-Toarcian extinction can be partly explained by the immigration of bivalves through the Hispanic Corridor and subsequent competitive replacement. The recovery hypothesis states that, in NW Europe, the renewed rise in diversity in the late Toarcian/Aalenian was largely a consequence of immigration of taxa from Andean South America via the Hispanic Corridor.

To test these hypotheses, I calculated immigration and origination rates of bivalves per million years. In both regions, early Pliensbachian to Aalenian immigration rates remained at low levels, thus disproving both hypotheses. By comparison, the origination of new species generally played a much more important role than immigration in controlling overall diversity of both regions. Future research should investigate if this is a more general pattern in the recovery of post-extinction biotas.

The apparently global Pliensbachian-Toarcian diversity crisis may be best explained by a combination of physicochemical factors, invoking intense volcanism, sea-level highstand and widespread anoxia, as well as biological factors. Recovery from this mass extinction commenced when origination rates increased again, which, in the Andean basins, was in the Aalenian and in NW Europe, the late Toarcian.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. W. Owen and J. A. Crame
Palaeobiogeography and the Ordovician and Mesozoic-Cenozoic biotic radiations
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2002; 194: 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]