Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worrall, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2002; v. 193; p. 245-254;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.193.01.18
© 2002 Geological Society of London

Risk Assessment Methodologies or Developing and Protecting Groundwater Resources

Direct assessment of groundwater vulnerability from borehole observations

F. Worrall

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

A method is developed for measuring the vulnerability of the catchment of a borehole to groundwater pollution based on observation of contaminant in the borehole and the region. The method uses Bayesian statistics to compare the proportion of pesticide detections in the region with that found in the borehole as a measure of groundwater vulnerability of that borehole catchment. Using data from California the method is demonstrated for multi-annual borehole observations of a set of compounds. The method has distinct advantages over present vulnerability assessment methods. The method calculates a continuous measure of borehole vulnerability rather than an index or score. This measure of borehole vulnerability is based solely on observations and not on expert opinion or the application of models. The use of Bayesian methods means that results can be used within a probabilistic risk assessment and can be updated as more information becomes available or as new regional data are considered. The assumptions and disadvantages of the methodology are discussed, but such methods could form the basis of testing the importance of climatic, soil and geological factors in controlling pollutant movement leading to improved management and protection of groundwater resources.