Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudwick, M. J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2001; v. 190; p. 51-60;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.05
© 2001 Geological Society of London

Jean-André de Luc and nature’s chronology

Martin J. S. Rudwick

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK

Jean-André de Luc (or Deluc) (1727–1817), who first proposed the term ‘geology’ almost in its modern sense, was one of the most prominent geologists of his time. His ‘theory of the Earth’, published in several versions between 1778 and 1809, divided geohistory in binary manner into two distinct phases. The fossiliferous strata had been formed during a prehuman ‘ancient history’ of immense but unquantifiable duration. Then the present continents had emerged above sea-level in a sudden physical ‘revolution’, at the start of the Earth’s ‘modern history’ of human occupation. De Luc argued that the rates of ‘actual causes’ or observable processes (erosion, deposition, volcanic activity, etc.) provided ‘natural chronometers’ that proved that the ‘modern’ world was only a few millennia in age; and he identified the natural revolution at its start as none other than the Flood recorded in Genesis. So ‘nature’s chronology’ could be constructed from natural evidence, to match the well-established historical science of chronology based on textual evidence from ancient cultures. De Luc’s natural chronology was restricted to the recent past, but it provided a template for later geologists to develop a geochronology extending into the depths of geohistory. The historical importance of de Luc’s work has only been obscured by the myth of intrinsic conflict between science and religion.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. J. Knell and C. L. E. Lewis
Celebrating the age of the Earth
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]