Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, C. L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2001; v. 190; p. 121-138;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.10
© 2001 Geological Society of London

Arthur Holmes’ vision of a geological timescale

Cherry L. E. Lewis

History of Geology Group, 21 Fowler Street, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 2AN, UK

Arthur Holmes (1890–1965) was a British geoscientist who devoted much of his academic life to trying to further the understanding of geology by developing a radiometric timescale. From an early age he held in his mind a clear vision of how such a timescale would correlate and unify all geological events and processes. He pioneered the uranium-lead dating technique before the discovery of isotopes; he developed the principle of ‘initial ratios’ thirty years before it became recognized as the key to petrogenesis, and he wrote the most widely read and influential geology book of the twentieth century. But despite all this, much of his contribution to geology has gone unrecognized in the historical literature. This paper attempts to redress this omission, to dispel some of the myths about Holmes’ life, and to trace his contribution to the development of the geological timescale.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. J. S. Rudwick
Jean-Andre de Luc and nature's chronology
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 51 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. N. Wyse Jackson
John Joly (1857-1933) and his determinations of the age of the Earth
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 107 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
E. L. Yochelson and C. L. E. Lewis
The age of the Earth in the United States (1891-1931): from the geological viewpoint
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 139 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. G. Brush
Is the Earth too old? The impact of geochronology on cosmology, 1929-1952
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 157 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. B. Dalrymple
The age of the Earth in the twentieth century: a problem (mostly) solved
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 205 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. W. Hofmann
Lead isotopes and the age of the Earth -- a geochemical accident
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 223 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. Manning
Time, life and the Earth
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2001; 190: 253 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]