Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2001; v. 185; p. 151-164;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.185.01.07
© 2001 Geological Society of London

Biogeochemistry

Biogeochemical exploration methods in the Canadian Shield and Cordillera

Colin E. Dunn

Geological Survey of Canada (Emeritus), 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 4B2, Canada

This review article focuses on field methods in biogeochemical exploration and is based largely on the author’s experience. Consideration is given to reasons for applying biogeochemical methods as alternatives or supplements to other surficial sampling media that can be used in the exploration for mineral deposits in glaciated terrain. Extensive root systems can absorb metals from the substrate and integrate the geochemical signature of large volumes of sediment, groundwater and sometimes bedrock, thereby providing a more representative reflection of the chemical environment than that obtained from some other media. Sampling methods and precautions that should be taken are outlined. Variables that govern plant chemistry include the heterogeneity of composition among plant species and plant tissues, and the modifying effects of the seasons and contamination from external sources. Studies indicate that biogeochemical methods can provide a more proximal indication of concealed mineralization than the distal indications typical of till geochemistry programmes. Consequently, comparisons of till and biogeochemical data can help to define vectors toward mineralized sources such that the two methods are complementary.