|
Economic and Applied Aspects |
Shell U.K. Exploration and Production, London
The nature and quality of clastic reservoir rocks is the result of a complex interplay of tectonic setting, provenance, depositional environment and diagenesis. In particular, it is now well established that the reconstruction of depositional environments in clastic successions provides the optimum framework for describing and predicting reservoir development and reservoir quality distribution on both regional (exploration) and field (production) scales.
This review, in the context of the 21st anniversary of the British Sedimentological Research Group (BSRG), expands the above-mentioned theme in relation to the development of depositional models of each of the major oil- and/or gas-bearing clastic reservoirs in the U.K. sector of the North Sea, which has been the subject of a surge in geological interest following the first gas discoveries approximately 21 years ago.
Each major reservoir interval is used to illustrate specific themes, with emphasis placed on how the application of depositional models has contributed to a better understanding of the exploration for, and the production from, the following reservoirs: (i) Permian aeolian and fluvial sands (Rotliegendes Sandstones, southern North Sea), (ii) Jurassic fluvial, deltaic and marginal marine sands (Lower Jurassic Statfjord Formation and Middle Jurassic Brent Group, northern North Sea), (iii) Jurassic shallow marine and deeper marine (mass flow) sands and conglomerates (Upper Jurassic Fulmar/Piper-type sands and Brae/Magnus-type deposits; central and northern North Sea), and (iv) Tertiary deep marine, turbidite fan deposits (Palaeocene and Eocene sands, central and northern North Sea).
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Morris, G. J. Hampson, and G. Maxwell Controls on facies architecture in the Brent Group, Strathspey Field, UK North Sea: implications for reservoir characterization Petroleum Geoscience, 2003; 9: 209 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. R. Olsen and R. J. Steel The significance of the Etive Formation in the development of the Brent system: distinction of normal and forced regressions Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 172: 91 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Gowland Facies characteristics and depositional models of highly bioturbated shallow marine siliciclastic strata: an example from the Fulmar Formation (Late Jurassic), UK Central Graben Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996; 114: 185 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. C. Cannon and S. Gowland Facies controls on reservoir quality in the Late Jurassic Fulmar Formation, Quadrant 21, UKCS Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996; 114: 215 - 233. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Martin A review of braided fluvial hydrocarbon reservoirs: the petroleum engineer's perspective Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1993; 75: 333 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Bjorlykke, T. Nedkvitne, M. Ramm, and G. C. Saigal Diagenetic processes in the Brent Group (Middle Jurassic) reservoirs of the North Sea: an overview Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1992; 61: 263 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Moss The petrophysical characteristics of the Brent sandstones Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1992; 61: 471 - 496. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
