Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burley, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Waugh, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1985; v. 18; p. 189-226;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1985.018.01.10
© 1985 Geological Society of London

Diagenesis

Clastic diagenesis

S. D. Burley, J. D. Kantorowicz & B. Waugh

Geologisches Institut, Universität Bern, Baltzerstrasse-1, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
Koninklijke/Shell Exploratie en Produktie Laboratorium, Volmerlaan 6, Rijswijk ZH, The Netherlands
AGAT Consultants Inc., 1215 18th Street, 260 Cable Building, Denver, Co 80202, USA

Diagenesis is the sum of those processes by which originally sedimentary clastic assemblages attempt to reach equilibrium with their environments. The subject has rapidly evolved, over the last 20 years, after several decades of routine petrographical analysis, to become a discipline of sophisticated analytical geochemistry. This progression may be traced through the evolution of depositional facies models, the growth of theoretical geochemistry, and the development and application of quantitative analytical techniques. Consequently, the study of diagenesis today involves the integration of data gathered from a range of interrelated disciplines.

The publication in recent years of such integrated studies, particularly from the Texas Gulf Coast of the U.S.A., has led to a number of wide ranging models being established. These models allow an interpretation of the sequence of authigenic minerals in terms of their relationship to the depositional environment or surface chemistry (eogenesis), burial or subsurface conditions (mesogenesis) and weathering or reexposure to surface conditions (telogenesis).

More specifically, once the pre-depositional controls on diagenesis have been established, it is possible to relate the inferred eogenetic mineral assemblages to exact geochemical sedimentary environments. Sedimentary mineral assemblages chemically are characterized by relative instability and so tend to interact with interstitial pore waters. Thus, in non-marine environments, mineral authigenesis may reflect arid-oxidizing, or wet-reducing pore-water conditions, and in the marine environment, either oxidizing or reducing pore waters.

During mesogenesis different processes become important. Elevated temperatures add energy to the reacting system, lowering reaction barriers and increasing reaction rates. Furthermore, widespread pore fluid migration at depth, transporting large quantities of solute, is likely to impart major, regional diagenetic changes to sediments. That there is a remarkable degree of consistency in deep burial settings suggests that depth-related processes conform to a predictable pattern.

Additional geochemical instability is introduced into the diagenetic system during uplift and exposure to the telogenetic realm. Minerals formed during burial, at elevated temperatures and pressures, and from concentrated formation waters, may become unstable in oxidizing, meteoric waters.

Diagenetic research requires the complete dissection of sedimentary rocks and, subsequently, the quantitative chemical and mineralogical analysis of their individual components. Such an approach to diagenetic studies, when related to an assessment of their paragenesis, may eventually lead to a predictive, integrated model for the evolution of sedimentary clastic rocks.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Parnell
Diagenesis and fluid flow in response to uplift and exhumation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2002; 196: 433 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
K. Bjorlykke
Fluid-flow processes and diagenesis in sedimentary basins
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1994; 78: 127 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. N. Palmer and M. E. Barton
Porosity reduction, microfabric and resultant lithification in UK uncemented sands
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1987; 36: 29 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]