Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wittenberg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mengel, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2000; v. 179; p. 401-414;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.179.01.24
© 2000 Geological Society of London

The Variscan lower continental crust: evidence for crustal delamination from geochemical and petrophysical investigations

A. Wittenberg1, C. Vellmer2, H. Kern3 & K. Mengel4

1 Institut für Mineralogie, Universität Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany Wittenberg{at}mineralogie.uni-hannover.de
2 Mineralogisch-Petrographisches Institut, Universität Hamburg, Grindelallee 48, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
3 Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, 24098 Kiel, Germany
4 Institut für Mineralogie und Mineralische Rohstoffe, Technische Universität Clausthal, Adolph-Roemer-Straße 2A, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany

Seismic observations along the European Geotraverse (EGT) Central Segment indicate an overall felsic composition of the Variscan crust, including 15 vol. % of mafic lower-crustal (MLC) rocks. As the Variscan continental crust is largely post-Archaean, its bulk composition should be basaltic andesitic rather than felsic (tonalitic), because primitive post-Archaean crust was formed by mantle extracted basaltic andesite magmas. The observed proportions of the Variscan continental crustal layers do not match the requirement of a mafic overall crust. Combining laboratory-derived, in situ seismic data (VP) with the refraction seismic data and the evidence from geological and geochemical investigations suggests that large amounts of MLC rocks are missing in the present-day lower crust. A mass balance calculation of the basaltic andesite bulk crust, considering a refined compilation of the Variscan MLC, gives a volume proportion of 37 vol. % for the felsic and 63 vol. % for the mafic components, for primitive crust prior to collision tectonics and orogenic root delamination. If large parts of this MLC have undergone eclogite-facies metamorphism at the orogenic root, large amounts of former basaltic-gabbroic and MLC cumulates could have been subtracted from the crust by its subsequent delamination processes which results in the currently observed proportion of the continental crust of the Variscan Orogen with a predominance of felsic rocks.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. Cloetingh, F. Beekman, P. A. Ziegler, J.-D. van Wees, and D. Sokoutis
Post-rift compressional reactivation potential of passive margins and extensional basins
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2008; 306: 27 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, MemoirsHome page
P. A. Ziegler, M. E. Schumacher, P. Dezes, J.-D. Van Wees, and S. Cloetingh
Post-Variscan evolution of the lithosphere in the area of the European Cenozoic Rift System
Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 2006; 32: 97 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. A. Ziegler, M. E. Schumacher, P. Dezes, J.-D. Van Wees, and S. Cloetingh
Post-Variscan evolution of the lithosphere in the Rhine Graben area: constraints from subsidence modelling
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 223: 289 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]