Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2000; v. 177; p. 31-46;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.177.01.03
© 2000 Geological Society of London

Molecular evidence on the evolution of the Bivalvia

D. C. Campbell

Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3315, USA
Biology Department, St Mary’s College of Maryland, 18952 E. Fisher Rd, St Mary’s City, MD 20686-3001, USA dcampbell{at}osprey.smcm.edu

Despite widespread agreement on the monophyly of several major taxa of bivalves, others remain uncertain and the relationships among them are debated. The present study compares new and published morphological phylogenies with new analyses based on 18S gene sequences.

All but one family and all superfamilies in the Bivalvia were monophyletic in all the analyses. Several higher taxa, including most subclasses and orders, were also resolved as monophyletic. Only Myoida shows strong evidence for polyphyly, with at least two origins from Veneroida. Autobranchia was supported as monophyletic in the parsimony analyses. Within Pteriomorphia, Ostreoida is the sister taxon of Pterioida, if not derived from within it, rather than closest to Pectinoida. The numerous points of agreement with morphology based analyses suggests that both types of evidence are converging on a common phylogeny; however, differences remain to be resolved by further study.