Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duck, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wewetzer, S. F. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2000; v. 175; p. 31-41;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.175.01.04
© 2000 Geological Society of London

Relationship between current measurements and sonographs of subtidal bedforms in the macrotidal Tay Estuary, Scotland

Robert W. Duck & Silke F. K. Wewetzer

Department of Geography, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland

Near bottom current measurements have been compared with sonographs revealing a variety of subtidal dune geometries at eight stations in the middle reaches of the macrotidal Tay Estuary, Scotland. At six stations, dune asymmetries did not support the tidal dominance expressed in terms of maximum or average current speeds. Determination of bottom tidal current dominance according to the length of time during which a speed of 0.5 ms–1 was exceeded, as a proxy for the inequality of the total ebb and flood tide bedload sediment transports, provides a better, but not perfect, correlation with sonographs. Other controls on dune asymmetry and reversal are height, sediment discharge rate and bottom current velocity fluctuations. The study has shown that bedload transport processes and pathways in this relatively small (c. 8 km2), dynamic part of the estuary are far more complex than previously inferred and near bed flows do not simply correspond with the surface water circulation pattern. Neither sonographs nor current data alone are adequate to gain an understanding of subtidal bedforms in such an environment.