Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2000; v. 175; p. 293-303;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.175.01.21
© 2000 Geological Society of London

How anthropogenic factors in the back-barrier area influence tidal inlet stability: examples from the Gulf Coast of Florida, USA

Richard A. Davis, Jr. & Patrick L. Barnard1

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California — Riverside, Riverside, California 92521-0423, USA rdavis{at}chuma.cas.usf.edu
Coastal Research Laboratory, Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA

Human development along the coast of the world has caused important changes to coastal morphodynamics. The barrier-inlet system of Florida, especially the tidal inlets, has been severely impacted by this development. Beginning in the 1920s and continuing through the 1960s there was: (1) extensive construction of fill-type causeways connecting the mainland to the barrier islands, (2) widespread dredge-and-fill construction along the backbarrier and mainland, and (3) dredging of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) in the back-barrier area.

The primary effect of these various types of construction and development was to cause instability of many inlets by diminishing the tidal flux through them. In some cases there was a combination of human and natural causes that resulted in the inlet degradation or closure such as at Dunedin Pass and Blind Pass, whereas at others this instability was almost exclusively the result of human activity such as at Midnight Pass. Although these detrimental development practices have been stopped, a large amount of irreparable damage has been done.