Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, C. T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zaykov, V. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 148; p. 259-270;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.148.01.14
© 1998 Geological Society of London

The fossil record of hydrothermal vent communities

C. T. S. Little1, R. J. Herrington1, V. V. Maslennikov2 & V. V. Zaykov2

1 The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
2 Institute of Mineralogy, Urals Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Miass, Chelyabinsk district 456301, Russia

There are 19 known fossiliferous volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits which range in age from the Silurian to the Eocene. Most of these are in the Ural Mountains, Russia. The deposits contain assemblages of inarticulate and rhynchonellid brachiopods; gastropod, bivalve and monoplacophoran molluscs; and a small diversity of worm tube morphologies, some of which may be attributable to alvinellid polychaetes and vestimentiferans. The fossils are preserved mainly as external moulds of pyrite, which is consistent with biomineralization processes occurring at modern vent sites. Most of the fossil taxa are new to science, but the lack of original shells and organic tubes makes placement in existing phylogenetic schemes difficult. A comparison between modern vent communities and fossil vent assemblages shows that vestimentiferans, alvinellid polychaetes, bivalves, gastropods, monoplacophorans and perhaps brachiopods are shared at higher taxonomic levels, but that arthropods are found only in the modern communities. There are no direct ancestor-descendant relationships between the fossil and modern vent molluscs and brachiopods. This demonstrates that the modern vent environment is not a refuge for the known Palaeozoic and Mesozoic shelly vent taxa. Hence, taxonomic groups have moved in and out of the vent ecosystem through time. These findings are discussed in relation to alternative hypotheses for the origins of modern vent communities.