|
Structure and Seal Analysis of Hydrocarbon Fields |
1 Statoil, Heidrun PETEK, PO Box 273, N-7501 Stjordal, Norway
2 Rock Deformation Research, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
A quantitative analysis of fault seal properties has been used in reservoir simulation modelling in the Heidrun Field. The inclusion of microstructural and petrophysical data from core analysis has resulted in a better prediction of reservoir communication and drainage patterns during production. Three main fault rock types were observed in the Heidrun cores, namely; cataclasites developed from clean sandstones, phyllosilicate framework fault rocks, created from impure sandstones and clay smears. The clay content of the host sediment is the controlling factor in determining which fault rock type dominates in the fault zones. Fault plane geometries were assessed from seismic-based juxtaposition analysis for input into the reservoir simulation model. The fault planes were divided into areas following the reservoir zonation, and transmissibility multipliers were assigned to each subarea of the fault planes in the model. The transmissibility multipliers are a function of fault rock permeability and fault rock width, as well as the matrix (host rock) permeability and the dimensions of the grid blocks used in the simulation model. Introducing a quantitative description of the faults has had a significant effect on the results of the reservoir simulation runs and has played an important role in the successful modelling and prediction of the observed gas breakthrough and pressure evolution. After actively using the transmissibilities during history matching of the simulation model, a remarkably good match to the observed well rates and pressures (flowing and shut-in) for the Jurassic Fangst and Upper Tilje reservoir units was achieved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Needham, A. Li, C. Carr, G. Schorr, S. Benmahiddi, and J.-L. Pena Faulting and fault sealing in the TAGI Formation of the Ourhoud Field, Algeria Petroleum Geoscience, 2008; 14: 379 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Manzocchi, A. E. Heath, B. Palananthakumar, C. Childs, and J. J. Walsh Faults in conventional flow simulation models: a consideration of representational assumptions and geological uncertainties Petroleum Geoscience, 2008; 14: 91 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Jolley, D. Barr, J. J. Walsh, and R. J. Knipe Structurally complex reservoirs: an introduction Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 1 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. J. Fisher and S. J. Jolley Treatment of faults in production simulation models Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 219 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Harris, A. Z. Vaszi, and R. J. Knipe Three-dimensional upscaling of fault damage zones for reservoir simulation Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 353 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Barr Conductive faults and sealing fractures in the West Sole gas fields, southern North Sea Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 292: 431 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||