Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kulm, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 146; p. 321-342;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.146.01.19
© 1998 Geological Society of London

The effects of upper plate deformation on records of prehistoric Cascadia subduction zone earthquakes

Lisa C. McNeill1,3, Chris Goldfinger2, Robert S. Yeats1 & Laverne D. Kulm2

1 Department of Geosciences, Wilkinson Hall, 104, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
2 College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JJ, UK

Geophysical data from the offshore Cascadia forearc reveal many Quaternary upper-plate faults and folds. Most active structures are within the accretionary wedge, but significant deformation is also found on the continental shelf. Several faults and synclines project into adjacent coastal bays where deformation of Pleistocene marine terraces is reported. Rapidly buried marsh deposits and drowned forests in these coastal lowlands are interpreted to record coseismic deformation by prehistoric subduction zone earthquakes. The extent and amount of such coastal subsidence has been used to infer characteristic magnitudes and recurrence intervals. However, the record may incorporate both elastic strain release on the subduction zone and localized permanent upper-plate deformation. Movement on upper-plate structures may be triggered by a subduction zone earthquake, as observed in the Nankai and Alaskan forearcs. Alternatively, they may deform independently of subduction zone earthquakes. Regardless of which style of deformation predominates, the record of coseismic subsidence is likely to be affected. Crustal deformation may also contribute to the preservation of subsided marshes. Modelling of subduction zone earthquake characteristics based on coastal marsh stratigraphy is likely to be inaccurate in terms of: (a) total apparent rupture length and earthquake magnitude; (b) amount of subsidence and hence the position of the locked zone; (c) recurrence interval. Most of these shelf and coastal structures respond to N-S compression, in contrast to convergence-related northeasterly compression in the accretionary prism, but in agreement with the regional stress field. Despite low historical coastal and continental shelf seismicity, upper-plate faults may also pose an independent seismic hazard.