Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thackray, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 146; p. 199-211;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.146.01.11
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Convergent-margin deformation of Pleistocene strata on the Olympic coast of Washington, USA

Glenn D. Thackray

Quaternary Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Department of Geology, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA thacglen{at}isu.edu

Quaternary tectonism on the central Olympic coast is dominated by the Kalaloch syncline, a broad (>32 km wavelength), low-amplitude (c. 45 m) fold deforming the Pleistocene glacial-nonglacial stratigraphic sequence. The stratigraphy includes two sequences of glacial and nonglacial sediments, one overlying and one underlying a prominent wave-cut surface. Stratigraphic and chronological data indicate that the buried wave-cut surface formed during isotope stage 7 or 5 sea-level highstands, probably during substage 5e or 5c. The elevation pattern of the wave-cut surface expresses the syncline most clearly. The outcrop patterns of overlying strata also reflect the syncline, as does outcrop-scale deformation in the underlying strata. Geological uplift rates for the wave-cut surface on the syncline’s north limb contrast in magnitude with, but are similar in pattern to, geodetically measured 1931–1974 uplift rates. Geological uplift rates range from –0.03 to 0.7 mm/year. The difference at each location between geological and geodetic uplift rates ranges from 0.4 to 1.0 mm/year, and is inferred to reflect interseismic strain accumulation. For each assumed age for the wave-cut surface, the inferred interseismic strain accumulation is nearly constant across the syncline’s north limb. Thus, the syncline accounts for most of the spatial variability in the 1931–1974 uplift rates. Comparison of the geological uplift rates with alternative representations of 1931–1974 uplift does not result in the same patterns, but does reveal a significant component of interseismic strain accumulation.