Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foulger, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hofton, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 146; p. 165-178;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.146.01.09
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Regional vertical motion in Iceland 1987–1992, determined using GPS surveying

G. R. Foulger & M. A. Hofton

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

Vertical motion in Iceland may arise from tectonic sources, e.g. large earthquakes and spreading episodes, isostatic movements owing to the change in mass of icecaps, and secular sinking of the volcanic pile under its own weight. Regional Global Positioning System (GPS) surveys covering the eastern half of Iceland have revealed the vertical motion for the period 1987–1992. Although the errors associated with the vertical component are large, exceptionally good agreement between independent data processing and agreement with isolated terrestrial measurements lends credence to the somewhat surprising results. These are dominated by relative uplift of c. 12 cm in the northern part of the Northern Volcanic Zone and subsidence of up to c. 12 cm elsewhere. This motion can be partially explained by recent tectonic and glacio-isostatic events. The most significant of these are the 1975–1984 Krafla spreading episode and isostatic uplift around the currently melting Vatnajökull icecap of c. 1 cm/year. However, a substantial amount of the observed motion cannot be explained by any known processes. It is concluded that hitherto unknown, largescale processes associated with the hotspot and plume, possibly continuing at depths of c. 75 km, may be responsible. Behaviour of this kind has been observed associated with the Yellowstone hotspot, which is broadly comparable with the Iceland hotspot. Future remeasurements of the GPS network in Iceland will be valuable for refining these observations.