Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waples, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Couples, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 141; p. 73-81;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.141.01.04
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Some thoughts on porosity reduction — rock mechanics, overpressure and fluid flow

D. W. Waples1 & G. D. Couples2,3

1 Consultant, 9299 William Cody Drive, Evergreen, CO 80439 USA
2 Department of Geology and Applied Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
3 Department of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK

A currently popular paradigm, that porosity reduction occurs as a direct consequence of the effective stress acting on the rock framework grains, is mechanistically incorrect. The commonly observed covariance between porosity and effective stress does not reflect a cause-and-effect relationship. Instead, it arises because both low effective stress and slow porosity reduction are consequences of the inability of compacting rocks to expel their pore fluids quickly enough to maintain normal fluid pressures. The process of porosity loss is here divided into sequential steps, and we argue that the expulsion of pore fluids is the rate-determining step leading to overpressuring. Thus, Darcy’s law assumes equal importance with the relationships describing the mechanical compaction of sediments. In this paper we describe how compaction can be treated as a Coulomb-plastic response that is functionally dependent on effective mean stress, deviatoric stress, and the state of compaction. In the next generation of basin models, a mechanistically correct approach is needed, combining both rock mechanics and hydrogeology.