Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Throndsen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wangen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 141; p. 109-116;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.141.01.07
© 1998 Geological Society of London

A comparison between 1-D, 2-D and 3-D basin simulations of compaction, water flow and temperature evolution

T. Throndsen & M. Wangen

Institute for Energy Technology, PO Box 40, N-2007, Kjeller, Norway

Is 3-D basin modelling really necessary? The answer depends on the type of problem under consideration. The Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) 3-D Basin Simulator offers the possibility to investigate certain aspects of this issue. It is a prototype 1-D, 2-D or 3-D basin simulator for reconstruction of the time-dependent pressure and temperature evolution of compacting sedimentary basins. Comparison of results, from 1-D, 2-D and 3-D simulations confirms that there may be significant differences due to water flow and pressure behaviour. The advantage of 2-D simulations as compared to 1-D is seen in overpressured configurations where 2-D allows more realistic calculations, while 1-D is less predictable. When going from 2-D to 3-D advantages are evident in configurations with pronounced 3-D basin geometries in combination with rapid processes and overpressure. The differences in water flow velocities and consequently the pressure calculations, may be quite significant. The rates in 3-D may be several orders of magnitude higher than in 2-D due to lateral focusing effects, while the overpressure still remains high. One consequence is, for example, reduced compaction in 3-D as compared to 2-D, with notable effects on basin geometry and temperature evolution of individual layers. Temperature anomalies due to increased convection in 3-D seem to be of less importance, unless processes of lateral focusing of water flow reach extreme levels.