Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubie, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 138; p. 199-214;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.138.01.12
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Disequilibrium during metamorphism: the role of nucleation kinetics

David C. Rubie

Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany

The sluggishness of nucleation, one of the most poorly understood and least-discussed processes involved in mineral reactions, is an important cause of disequilibrium during metamorphism. Both field-based and experimental petrological studies show that metastable phases can persist far from equilibrium on long time scales because the stable phases are unable to nucleate. This behaviour applies not only to solid-solid reactions but also to some dehydration and melting reactions. Although the degree of overstepping required for nucleation during polymorphic phase transformations is relatively small (2–4 kbar on an experimental time scale), nucleation can be much more sluggish for reactions involving two or more product phases. When reactions occur at conditions of large overstepping due to delayed nucleation, reaction rates can be very fast because of the effect of the large free energy change on growth kinetics. Under these circumstances, new metastable phases may form instead of the stable mineral assemblage, as predicted by the Ostwald step rule. Such metastable phases can persist during metamorphism, even during high-strain ductile deformation and fluid influx, but without any obvious texture evidence to indicate that they are metastable.