Lyell Collection
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, P. W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sorbie, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 136; p. 9-16;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.02
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Measurement, Scaling and Calibration

A review of up-scaling and cross-scaling issues in core and log data interpretation and prediction

P. W. M. Corbett, J. L. Jensen1 & K. S. Sorbie

Department of Petroleum Engineering Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
1 University of Alaska at Fairbanks, Alaska

In a heterogeneous geological formation, each rock petrophysical property (e.g., permeability, porosity, and electrical conductivity) reflects the heterogeneity and varies in a manner related to the underlying changes in fabric (grainsize, mineralogy, lamination, wettability, etc.). However, measurements, both laboratory and downhole, are made at certain volume scales dictated by the size of the core plug used or the wireline log resolution. The comparison of core and log data needs to account for both the scale and physics of the particular measurements and how these relate to the underlying scale of the geological heterogeneity of the formation.

In this review, these two fundamental issues are addressed as follows:

(a) measurement scale and how it relates to the ‘true’ or ‘required’ petrophysical properties of the formation is defined as ‘up-scaling’;
(b) measurement physics and how we relate the physics of one measurement (e.g. permeability) to that of another (e.g. density, electrical, or acoustic properties) is termed ‘cross-scaling’.

We illustrate how these two issues arise in the comparison and prediction of permeability using several published studies. We also outline an approach to petrophysical measurement reconciliation termed ‘genetic petrophysics’. This combines all three elements—measurement scale, measurement physics, and geology—to provide an integrated and robust model. We illustrate this approach for permeability to provide fit-for-purpose models of anisotropy in the near-well region of a reservoir.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
K. Nordahl, P. S. Ringrose, and R. Wen
Petrophysical characterization of a heterolithic tidal reservoir interval using a process-based modelling tool
Petroleum Geoscience, 2005; 11: 17 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]