|
Modelling Transpression and Transtension |
1 Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0E8
3 Manitoba Energy & Mines, 25-59 Elisabeth Drive, Thompson, MB, Canada R8N 1X4 slin{at}norcom.mb.ca
2 Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada, E3B 5A3
We describe a natural shear zone with triclinic symmetry, present a general model for triclinic shear zones based on natural examples, and investigate the kinematics and strain geometry within such zones.
In the Roper Lake shear zone in the Canadian Appalachians, the orientation of a stretching lineation is oriented approximately down-dip near the shear zone boundary and becomes gradually shallower towards the centre. The structures in the central portion of the shear zone exhibit approximately monoclinic symmetry where the poles to both the S- and C-surfaces, the stretching lineation on the S-surfaces and the striations on the C-surfaces all plot in a great circle girdle. However, the lineations from the marginal portion do not plot in the same girdle, and the bulk symmetry of the shear zone is triclinic. Theoretical modelling shows that the observed strain geometry can be interpreted by an oblique transpression with a larger ratio of simple shear to pure shear in the centre of the shear zone than in the margin. The latter suggests a higher degree of localization of the zone boundary-parallel movement component relative to the boundary-normal compression component.
We emphasize that, as the imposed boundary displacements for most natural shear zones lie between dip-slip and strike-slip, their movement pictures are generally triclinic; monoclinic shear zones are special end members. Structural data that exhibit monoclinic symmetry do not necessarily mean that they resulted from a monoclinic movement picture; the present modelling demonstrates that a triclinic movement picture with a high ratio of boundary-parallel movement to boundary-normal movement can result in apparent monoclinic structural geometry. The results of the modelling also show that the simple statement made for simple shear zones that stretching lineations will align with, and therefore indicate, the shear direction cannot be extrapolated to three-dimensional transpressional (or transtensional) shear zones.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L.R. JONES, B. LAFRANCE, and C.J. BEAUMONT-SMITH Structural Controls on Gold Mineralization at the Burnt Timber Mine, Lynn Lake Greenstone Belt, Trans-Hudson Orogen, Manitoba Exploration and Mining Geology, 2006; 15: 89 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Williams, D. Jiang, and S. Lin Interpretation of deformation fabrics of infrastructure zone rocks in the context of channel flow and other tectonic models Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2006; 268: 221 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Reddy and C. Buchan Constraining kinematic rotation axes in high-strain zones: a potential microstructural method? Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2005; 243: 1 - 10. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Edwards and L. Ratschbacher Seismic and aseismic weakening effects in transtension: field and microstructural observations on the mechanics and architecture of a large fault zone in SE Tibet Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2005; 245: 109 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Macinnes and J. C. White Geometric and kinematic analysis of a transpression terrane boundary: Minas fault system, Nova Scotia, Canada Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 224: 201 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Occhipinti and S. M. Reddy Deformation in a complex crustal-scale shear zone: Errabiddy Shear Zone, Western Australia Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 224: 229 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Bailey, B. E. Francis, and E. E. Fahrney Strain and vorticity analysis of transpressional high-strain zones from the Virginia Piedmont, USA Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 224: 249 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Klepeis and G. L. Clarke The evolution of an exposed mid-lower crustal attachment zone in Fiordland, New Zealand Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 227: 197 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Van der Wateren, S. J. Kluiving, and L. R. Bartek Kinematic indicators of subglacial shearing Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 176: 259 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Roman-Berdiel, A. Aranguren, J. Cuevas, J. M. Tubia, D. Gapais, and J.-P. Brun Experiments on granite intrusion in transtension Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 174: 21 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||