Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mather, J.
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 130; p. 211-217;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.130.01.19
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Is all groundwater worth protecting? The example of the Kellaways Sand

John Mather1, Dawn Halliday1 & Jeremy Joseph2

1 Dept of Geology, Royal Holloway, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX
2 Shanks and McEwan, Woburn Sands, Bucks MK17 8TA

Many formations treated as Minor Aquifers for the purposes of resource protection do not meet accepted definitions of aquifers. The Kellaways Sand is a typical example, and modern waste-disposal licences require the installation of an engineered containment system to protect groundwater within it. However, the formation is clay-rich and only 4 to 5 m in thickness, and has a transmissivity of around 1.3 x 10–1 m2day–1. Contained water quality is poor with salinities well above maximum admissible concentrations for drinking water. As the Kellaways Sand does not yield water to pumping wells, the only rational reason for protection is that the formation might contribute to baseflow in the River Ouse to the northeast. However, hydraulic gradients are such that seepage rates to the river will not exceed more than a few cubic metres per year over the length of outcrop adjacent to the river. It is concluded that the installation of engineered mineral liners at the base of brickpits in the Lower Oxford Clay do nothing to reduce the risks associated with waste disposal. Resources spent on protecting the Kellaways Sand could be better used in other areas of environmental protection.