Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gabrielsen, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Alsaker, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1998; v. 127; p. 49-64;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.127.01.05
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Identification and spatial distribution of fractures in porous, siliciclastic sediments

Roy H. Gabrielsen1, Randi-Kristin Aarland1,2,3 & Einar Alsaker1

1 Geological Institute, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
2 Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Sandsliveien 90, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
3 ESSO Harge a.s., Grenseveien 6, N-4033 Forus, Norway

Spatial and size distribution data of fractures provide essential information in statistical bulk strain estimates and in predictive fracture scaling models for sediments which have undergone brittle deformation. Most fracture populations in naturally deformed sediments include structures which originated at different stages, and in response to different conditions during the deformation history of the rock. Hence, the final fracture population may contain fractures which genetically are related to gravitational (near-surface) instabilities, burial, uplift and unroofing, thermal expansion and contraction, and regional tectonism. Furthermore, grain size, bed thickness and different rheological properties may strongly influence the fracture style and frequency.

Particularly when only well cores are available, identification of fractures of different genetic origin is difficult, and fracture classification and predictive modelling can only be accomplished with data acquired from careful fracture logging. In such logging, information on position of the well relative to major structures, the geometry of nearby faults, and the general geological (sedimentary and tectonic) environment need to be included. Also, fracture frequencies should be compared to, and normalized according to, lithology and bed thickness, and the fracture frequency diagrams should be corrected for eventual well deviation before predictive fracture frequency modelling is performed.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
C. Lansigu and R. Bouroullec
Staircase normal fault geometry in the Gres d'Annot (SE France)
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 221: 223 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]