Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1996; v. 114; p. 235-249;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.114.01.11
© 1996 Geological Society of London

Upper Jurassic sandstone reservoir quality and distribution on the Fladen Ground Spur

Geoff Freer1, Andrew Hurst2 & Paul Middleton3

1 Badley Ashton and Associates, Winceby House, Winceby, Horncastle, Lincolnshire LN9 6PB, UK
2 Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 2UE, UK
3 BP Exploration, Dyce, Aberdeen AB2 0PB, UK

During the Oxfordian to Early Kimmeridgian much of the Fladen Ground Spur was a positive feature and sourced clastic deposition in the Piper Basin, Witch Ground and South Viking grabens. The eudoxus flooding event introduced shallow marine conditions onto the Fladen Ground Spur, and during the continuing transgression, a veneer of clastic sediments was deposited. Three facies units are defined: facies 1 — thin, low-high-energy glauconitic sandstone; facies 2 — medium-high-energy clean, well-sorted medium-grained sandstone; facies 3 — low-energy, fine-grained argillaceous sandstone. Reservoir quality is evaluated using porosity data from neutron porosity and bulk density logs. Porosity-permeability cross-plots provide a workable relationship for permeability prediction in uncored wells. Initial results show that, predictably, facies 2 sandstone has the best poroperm characteristics. Facies 1 sandstone contains locally derived clasts, the diverse nature of which affects reservoir quality. Subcrop is interpreted to be an important, if not causal, factor that controls reservoir quality in facies 1 sandstone.