Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gamson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1996; v. 109; p. 165-179;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.109.01.12
© 1996 Geological Society of London

Coal as a Reservoir

Coal microstructure and secondary mineralization: their effect on methane recovery

Paul Gamson1, Basil Beamish2 & David Johnson3

1 AusSpec International Pty Ltd, P.O. Box 2235, Kew MDC, Melbourne, Victoria 3101, Australia
2 Department of Geology, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
3 James Cook University, Townsville, North Queensland, Australia

Methane production from coal seams rather than porous sandstone reservoirs is now recognized as a valuable and recoverable energy source in Australia. The Bowen Basin of Australia possesses well defined coal seams that contain major methane resources. However, commercial gas production to date has been hampered by the low permeabilities of the coal seams. Recovery of this valuable resource will be assisted by a fundamental understanding of coal microstructures and presence of mineralization, and their influence on the gas flow behaviour through coal.

This paper examines the relationships between coal type, microstructure, secondary mineralization and gas flow behaviour. The study demonstrates that Bowen Basin coals should not be viewed as simply a dual porosity system of micropores which are surrounded by cleats. Instead, studies using scanning electron microscopy show the Bowen Basin coals have a third porosity system comprising a hierarchy of micron-sized fractures and micronsized cavities at a level between the micropores and the cleat/macropore system, which vary according to coal type.

To determine the influence such microstructures have on the flow of gas through the coal matrix, sorption experiments were carried out on small solid blocks of coal, using a new gravimetric technique. The results demonstrate that a clear distinction exists between diffusivity of dull and bright coals in response to coal microstructure. The gas sorption data suggests that both dull and bright coals can be divided into two categories: coal which have a rapid sorption behaviour and coals which have a slow sorption behaviour.

The results of the sorption experiments indicate that size, continuity, connectivity of the microstructures, and the extent of minerals infilling the fractures and cavities, play a significant contribution to overall permeability, and are likely to play a major rate-limiting factor in the flow of methane through coal at a level between diffusion at the micropore level and laminar flow at the cleat level. The studies indicate that the flow behaviour of gas through coal seams in the Bowen Basin is unlikely to be solely dependent on the cleat system but rather a combination of the cleat, microstructure and secondary mineralization in coal.