Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mattei, M.
Right arrow Articles by Faccenna, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1996; v. 105; p. 141-146;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.105.01.13
© 1996 Geological Society of London

Central Mediterranean and Carpathians

Lack of Late Miocene to Present rotation in the Northern Tyrrhenian margin (Italy): a constraint on geodynamic evolution

M. Mattei1, C. Kissel2, L. Sagnotti3, R. Funiciello1 & C. Faccenna1

1 Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, Terza Università, Via Ostiense, 169-00154 Roma, Italy
2 Centre des Faibles Radioactivities CNRS-CEA, 91198 Gif sur Yvette, France
3 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica, Via di Vigna Murata, 605-00143 Roma, Italy

This is an extended abstract which discusses palaeomagnetic results from Neogene formations in the Tyrrhenian margin of northern and central Italy. These data have been previously published by Sagnotti et al. (1994) and Mattei et al. (1995b).

Palaeomagnetic data have been widely used in reconstructing the geodynamic evolution of the Central Mediterranean. The pioneering research mainly focused on the tectonic interpretation of palaeomagnetic results from Jurassic to Eocene limestone formations from the Umbria-Marche Apennines (Lowrie & Alvarez 1974; Channell & Tarling 1975; Channell et al. 1978; VandenBerg et al. 1978). These studies identified a counterclockwise rotation which was believed to extend across the entire Italian peninsula. This rotation was subsequently identified in coeval formations from other sectors of the ‘Adriatic Promontory’ (e.g. Márton & Veljovic 1983; VandenBerg 1983; Lowrie 1986). The age of the rotation was initially defined as Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic. The quality and consistency of these data led to their widespread incorporation into geodynamic models for the Neogene evolution of the peninsula. In many models (e.g. Hill & Hayward 1985; Sartori 1990; Doglioni 1991; Castellarin et al. 1992), the counterclockwise rotation of the Mesozoic and Early Cenozoic formations was assumed to have occurred during the post-Mid-Miocene opening of the Tyrrhenian Sea (to the west) and to have affected all the geodynamic provinces of the Italian peninsula. In the last few years, however, structural and stratigraphic studies (summarized in CNR 1989) have shown that the main tectonic events in the peninsula took place in the Late Miocene to Pleistocene time

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.