Lyell Collection

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, D.
Right arrow Articles by Swarbrick, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 1996; v. 104; p. 321-345;
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.104.01.18
© 1996 Geological Society of London

Compaction as a primary control on the architecture and development of depositional sequences: conceptual framework, applications and implications

Dave Hunt1, Tim Allsop2 & Richard E. Swarbrick2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2 Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

A conceptual model is developed integrating the compaction process into a sequence stratigraphic framework, and incorporating an understanding of the ways that carbonate platforms respond to sea-level changes. The application of this model to a range of well-constrained examples allows examination of the compaction process within a high resolution temporal framework. This approach helps to gain a better understanding of the compaction process in the shallow subsurface. Conversely, the recognition of unconformities ‘enhanced’ by compaction-induced differential subsidence illustrates the dynamic and interactive role played by compaction during sequence development. It is this aspect of the compaction process, as a control of accommodation development, facies patterns and ultimately sequence architecture, that is the focus of interest here. Examples of compactionally ‘enhanced’ unconformities show compaction to be a dynamic process that can act as a primary control of sequence architecture and development. It is clear that compaction is a much underestimated process in extant sequence stratigraphic models.