|
Numerical and Geophysical Modelling |
Fault Dynamics Project, Department of Geology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 OEX, UK
1 Institute of Earth Sciences (Jaume Almera), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Marti i Franques, s/n 08028 Barcelona, Spain
A numerical model is presented in which a viscous layer flows in response to differential loading by deltaic sedimentation. No density effects are cconsidered; the mobile layer and overlying sediments deform solely in response to differential thicknesses of sedimentary overburden. Modelling results include the following key features: (1) sedimentary depocentres are asymmetric and spoon-shaped, with flat-lying shelf strata grading laterally into foreset slope strata at a prograding shelf-slope break; (2) the locus of deformation is controlled by the position of the shelf-slope break; and (3) a displaced bulge of mobile substrate migrates seaward faster than the shelf-slope break progrades. Using viscosities characterisitic of natural salt (
= 1016 to 1019 Pa s), the sensitivity of the model to several parameters is examined. Increasing the mobile layer thickness increases the rate of substrate withdrawal in a manner similar to decreasing its viscosity. A shorter sediment transport distance results in steeper depositional slopes and faster substrate withdrawal. Comparison with a Miocene example from offshore Texas demonstrates that structures qualitatively attributed to differential loading can be successfully modelled using reasonable values for sediment supply, relative sea-level rise, and substrate thickness.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. McClay, T. Dooley, and G. Zamora Analogue models of delta systems above ductile substrates Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 216: 411 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.M. Totterdell and A.A. Krassay The role of shale deformation and growth faulting in the Late Cretaceous evolution of the Bight Basin, offshore southern Australia Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 216: 429 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||